Full review text opened.

Google - Sep 28, 2026
(Translated by Google) Experience at this Mazda dealership: Demand transparency in the numbers.
I visited this dealership interested in a Mazda CX-90 after inquiring about a promotion. Before going, I specifically asked if the person I was speaking with worked directly for the dealership or for an external broker, and I was told they were a dealership employee. However, upon arrival, I was informed that sales were handled through external brokers. Regarding the offer I had inquired about, I was told that the units allocated to that promotion were no longer available.
I decided to test drive the CX-90 anyway. After the test drive, they presented me with a lease proposal with a term, monthly payment, and down payment. The values presented were substantially different from the original promotion.
When I requested the formal financial breakdown (lease worksheet or buyer's order) to review key calculation parameters—such as the money factor and residual value—the finance representative indicated that it was not possible to provide this information at that time and that these details would only be included in the final contract after accepting the agreement.
As a customer with excellent credit (Tier 1) and a genuine intention to purchase, I do not consider it viable to accept a financial commitment without clearly reviewing the factors that determine the monthly payment. Transparency in the pre-signing breakdown is fundamental in any negotiation of this type, which is why I decided not to proceed with the transaction.
Recommendation for future Mazda customers:
Confirm the exact stock number and availability of the offered unit beforehand.
Request a complete written breakdown of the lease calculation (money factor, residual value, and additional charges) before accepting any payment or proposal.
(Original)
Experiencia en este concesionario Mazda: Exijan transparencia en los números.
Visité este concesionario interesado en una Mazda CX-90 tras consultar una promoción disponible. Antes de acudir, pregunté expresamente si la persona con la que me comunicaba trabajaba directamente para el concesionario o si pertenecía a un servicio de bróker externo, y se me confirmó que era personal del concesionario. Sin embargo, al llegar al lugar, me informaron que la atención se gestionaba a través de brókers externos. Respecto a la oferta consultada, me indicaron que las unidades asignadas a esa promoción ya no estaban disponibles.
Decidí probar la CX-90 de todas formas. Posterior a la prueba, me presentaron una propuesta de lease con plazo, pago mensual y pago inicial (down payment). Los valores presentados eran sustancialmente diferentes de la promoción original.
Al solicitar el desglose financiero formal (lease worksheet o buyer's order) para revisar parámetros fundamentales del cálculo —como el money factor y el valor residual—, el representante del área financiera indicó que no era posible proporcionar dicha información en ese momento y que esos detalles solo se verían en el contrato final tras aceptar el acuerdo.
Como cliente con crédito excelente (Tier 1) y con una intención real de compra, no considero viable aceptar un compromiso financiero sin revisar con claridad los factores que determinan el pago mensual. La transparencia en el desglose previo a la firma es fundamental en cualquier negociación de este tipo, motivo por el cual decidí no continuar con la operación.
Recomendación para futuros clientes de Mazda:
Confirmen previamente el número de stock exacto y la disponibilidad de la unidad en oferta.
Soliciten por escrito el desglose completo del cálculo del lease (money factor, valor residual y cargos adicionales) antes de aceptar cualquier pago o propuesta.